Mag....do you have a SWAG (sophiscated wild ass guess) as to what we have or do not have her?

1.  why doesn't someone just buy the whole company, given its low makert cap?

2.  my primary thought with the atty withdrawal is that it is a slam dunk for them.

3.  would have also thought that there would be more tax loss harvesting of losses? (of course, given the market's performance the last three months, there are plenty of other places to take year-end losses).

4.  When Cliff would not buy (he eventually did buy a few) shares, because, he said, "it was too risky."   WAS THE RISK THE TECHNOLOGY, the ability of our attys, the ability of our management team, the snake-in-the-grass Leckrone (sp?)...all the above.  (i would define our 'management team' here to be Gloria and the Atty from Georgia).  (the board has given Cliff no power except to do the administrative stuff, imo...he is not in a decision making position as determined by the board). 

5.  if we do have something of value here...value determinted by the loyal opposition, there will be a settlement.  ...probably 'on the court house steps' so to say....with our side accepting a 20 percent discount to negate the always present risk of actually going to court.

6.  it will be very disappointing if our side accepts a nuisance fee settlement just to put an end to it.  Better to actually go to court and have the judge say zilch.

so...Magbeach, if you have a opinion of value, i would be interested!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

thanks for listening.