Counsels to withdraw - what motivation?
posted on
Sep 08, 2017 06:48AM
Amended Infringement Contentions were filed (work done by PDS lawyers up to June 16th 2017
One Month later July 17th, 2017 no reply by the defendants (NDOC5) on the Amended Infringement Contentions, but Motion to Withdraw as Councels. Non-opposed by Defendants.
On August 17t, 2017 Marci Brown showes up as "Director of TPL, with authority to act on behalf of the same". (page 7)
The Brown´s used to be THE enemy´s of the Leckrones. So a lot was going on behind the scenes, no? Now PTSC can Partner with TPL. Brown´s have a claim of about $ 20Mio. against TPL, so they are interrested to somehow get that money.
Change of councel, that ONE party is leaving such a case seems to be surprising, but acceptable. BUT all parties to leave as counsel could indicate that there could be a general strategic move...
Strategic move to what....? Anyone ?
All just IMO