If that is the case then by now you should know that one of the main problems that ptsc faces is the lack of real and substantial communication. Open, honest and complete communication between the company and shareholders.

The most recent case in point is this recent speculation on what is going on with the various filing`s, motions etc here in Ca. regarding the lawsuit(s) in relation to the JP4 (in Ca. I think it still would be JP5) vs the suits in Texas.

Right now all ptsc has going for it is the spec. that we will succeed in the suits of infringement againist the JP companies and the other 140 odd companies that ptsc has mentioned over the years. If there is negative publicity in relationship to the suits then that is not good for the retail shareholders.

I respectfully submit that you must communicate regularly and openly on a regular basis to we your retail shareholders (I dare say that the Swartz contingent knows what is going on, which by the way is defintely a big no no in the eyes of the SEC). In addition when substantive items occur which may affect the company (legal is substantive) then you must let us know in a timely fashion (today is the 9th the filings occurred on the 6th, way past time).

Sir, there are many of us who are long time shareholders who are just about at our wits end with the seeming sheenigans of the company and feel that we, by law, are not being treated openly and fairly as the law proscibes we should. In the new year I for one hope that you will have the company turn over a new leaf and truly make ptsc an informed publicly held company.

Thank you

marc