The following e-mail has been sen t to ir@ptsc.com no less than 7 times. On 5/22, 6/1, 6/3, 6/11 and 3x on 6/12. Not even an acknowledgement of its receipt, much less a courteous and/or substantial response has been provided in return. Professionalism at it's finest! I suppose based on my e-mail's unprofessional tone, and inflamatory language, I shoudn't expect a response. I guess since the company won't shed any light on their actions, it's up to us shareholders to do so instead. Bravo Cliff, Gloria, and Carlton! You're shining examples of professionalism and competence! I'm sure your families are proud of your efforts and integrity!
In reading the 8K filed yesterday regarding the termination of the most recent Alliacense agreement with PDS, it specifically mentions the “Amended Allicense Services and Novation Agreement” that was effective on 7/24/14.
Is it accurate that the referenced “Amended Allicense Services and Novation Agreement” updated and amended the previous agreement with the pertinent clauses that are listed in that 7/24/14 agreement, and thus REPLACED the previous agreement rendering the previous agreements to 7/24/14 no longer in play?
Thus, with yesterday’s filing, is PDS now free of any contractual agreements with Alliacense and thus free to pursue licensing of the MMP with all infringers, using Dominion Harbor Group LLC?
Or is there language in the Alliacense agreements that would allow the termination of the most recent amended agreement to cause PDS and Alliacense to revert to the previous version of their agreements?
Please clarify. Thank you.