Re: Frozen litigation ..This is why Shareholders should NOT want a Settlement
in response to
by
posted on
Jan 06, 2015 03:03PM
and why I hope the Court exercises the wisdom in providing a Ruling which will greatly impact and hinder the leverage no Ruling would provide to the "frozen Litigation" by all those others who are not a party to the HTC Settlement Agreement.
To do otherwise, imo, will be opening up a strategy of almost endless litigation and Appeal, and welcoming duplicative legal strategies by those Parties straight out of the HTC playbook. Our financial and time resources would be squeezed like a lemon until we eventually accepted the kinds of collective licensing fees that would by coincidence be just enough to keep the company on life support; but not nearly enough to justify stock ownership as an investment or even provide sufficient liquidity interest for the 400,000,000 Shares we still have in the float. I would just as soon have a negative Ruling against us than continue on as Investors dying from thirst. Should that occur, there is an old expression that would be applicable here .. "Kill it before it dies".
IMO, with a Settlement, we are at a serious disadvantage in all our non HTC future licensing efforts. Is HTC danging a carrot and thereby taking the Bullet for the rest of the potential infringers ? Do you think this is a coordinated Industry plan at work ?
That's how I see it.