I would have much preferred that an outside entity/person was involved. This could have been interpreted to have ment that Mr V saw something that excited him, that drew him to want to be involved enough to overcompensate for the messy and disfunctional management that had gone on with exploiting and handling the MMP.

Now I see Mr V's participation more as simply a means for a large Creditor getting on the PDS management committee inorder to watch over and have some input over the efforts which will be the source for him to have his TPL debt repaid.

No disrespect ment to Mr V or his abilities, but as a PTSC Shareholder, it's very disappointing.