Marc wrote..
"The agreement the ptsc Board made with dl to settle our suit included a 3 person panel (tpl rep/ptsc rep/independent rep). This panel was to approve ALL licenses of the mmp. We know that there has been no independent rep on this panel to date."
__________________________________________________
My thoughts..
I would suggest that this is the best point of attack. As fraud was alledged and this seat remains unfilled, does PTSC not have a fiduciary / legal duty to fill this seat with an independant representative?....
If the seat remains unfilled, would not the potential for fraud contiue to occur? This was to be one of the "fixes" to cure such overhanded dealings.
If we pushed the right buttons, I think this should be something that is doable and if we focus on this issue we should be able to make some hay in this regard. IMO