These are boilerplate arguments being used against us.

Respondents are continuing to try to taint us by telling the Commission that we are strictly a "Patent Assertion Entity", extracting licensing fees on technology we don't utilize and that were acquired specifically to extort fees from commerce related companies contributing to the economy and the ongoing needs of the american consumer.

I say Respondents brought this on themselves by not negotiating for a license in good faith over the past 5 years, and are even now, still attempting to exploit the legal system by claiming it may cause harm to the American consumer; but this is only as a pretext to increase their unfair profit making on our technology and against other licensees, and to maximumize their leverage of continuing to prolong avoidance of addressing the legitimate patent protections the MMP is entitled to.