I have a question. It's my guess that HTC has a much larger infringing product line than just those we've included in this case. For example, over the 2006-2012 time frame, they've made approximately $50B in revenues, but we've only identified about $8B of that as revenue coming from phones we've included in this case.

For the purposes of this question, let's assume I am correct and that of the other $42B in revenue earned over the time frame in quesiton, it ALL comes from the sale of PHONES THAT INFRINGE, but that for some reason, we chose not to include (ie. too hard to prove, some quirk that made infringement less obvious, etc. etc.).

If that is the case, and there is simply a court judgement awarded to our side, and not an actual settlement between HTC and TPL/PTSC, would our side technically be able to re-ignite legal proceedings for the remaining phones that they didn't go after in this case? I'm not suggesting the would or should, just wondering if a court judgement would be isolated to settling ONLY the phones / products covered in this litigation. Or woud a court judgement by default be considered a typical all encompassing MMP license since that's what TPL/PTSC USUALLY consumates with the infringers that become licensees, and cover all of HTC's product lines regardless of whether they were part of this litigation or not.