EASE. Thanks for that great post. As a person of some ordinary skill, I have been trying to understand that latin for days. They claim not variable. We claim variable with proof. strong language from our side.

The itc judge seemed to travel away from from edot and itc. Our side maybe did not see this coming, and could have been late supplying some data. Only to have it excluded from his proceedings.

Now a question. The itc depended heavily on the ring oscillator being on the pll. Does the ro on the pll control the variability? And does the new judge indicate any feelings on this and are any other claims infringed? or is this it?