Not sure where you are getting your information from. I never said anything about Dr. O's testimony. From the joint statement filed June 25
HTC and Nintendo have each conferred with Complainants regarding the exhibits that
Complainants seek to admit through the deposition designations for Mr. Liang and Mr. Tsugawa
and have come to following agreements.
As to the documents Complainants seek to admit through Nintendo’s party witness:
Complainants have agreed to withdraw from their Motion the following documents listed
in Exhibit B to their Motion: CX-542C; CX-555C; CX-557C; CX-559C; CX-564C; CX-
565C; CX-566C; CX-567C; CX-552C; RX-687C.
Complainants and Nintendo agree to submit for admission revised versions of the
Nintendo interrogatory responses that Complainants seek to admit as CX-964C and CX
965C, with the revised versions including only include the specific interrogatory response
that was discussed in the designated deposition testimony.
As to the documents Complainants seek to admit through HTC’s party witness:
Complainants have agreed to withdraw from their Motion the following documents listed
in Exhibit B to the Motion: CX-199; CX-393C; CX-402C; CX-933; CX-412C; CX-
413C; CX-414C; CX-890C.
Complainants and HTC agree that CX-935C, CX-936, and CX-158 will be admitted only
for demonstrative purposes.
The Staff has notified counsel for HTC and Nintendo that the Staff does not oppose the
Motion as modified by the agreements stated in this Joint Statement.
Complainants, HTC, and Nintendo will contact the Administrative Law Judge’s attorney
advisor to seek guidance regarding submission of the revised exhibits and a corrected version of
Complainants’ Final Exhibit List.
