If we win I honestly believe the post I'm responding to is the reason why. Here is the link again. http://www.berkeley-da.com/prod/datasheets/PLLJitterDavid%20Lee_IEEE_2002.pdf. This idea of VCO jitter was in one of the papers that was in the supplemental brief by Dr. O that was not permitted by Judge Gildea, but Judge Gildea also said he would allow Dr. O to testify to the ideas of the paper. The Texas Instruments expert was, according to the expert rescheduling ITC document, going to be used (testify) first for, I believe, 1.5 hours to set the stage for Dr. O. TI's expert wrote a paper about jitter also, and so I'm speculating that the ring oscillator VCO is not always controlled by the external clock as it, during short interval periods, can run like a free running oscillator, which is 100% the 336. The ring oscillator does not always need to run at its maximum possible speed, which Is one of the claim constructions we won. Opty, take a look at the paper. Thoughts?