From my past recollection... Moore would not need a license... Inventors who resposible for patents may not own the patetnt but the right to use the technology unless it was part of an agreement.... However every case and situtaion is dfifferent.... example...I always wonder why we let TPL/ Moore got half of the MMP... but thanks to Greg Bailey enlightenment...

generally speaking companies who employee's are responsible for patent..(they are paying the individual) the company owns the patent..... the worker has the rights to that patent...

This was my take after reasearching the subject during the MMP dispute....

Once again each case is not the same.... Greg Bailey made it clear Moore was not getting paid when he worked with Fish....