<1) no, that's not what I'm saying,>
It wasn't easy, but I did manage to get it out of you.
<2) if you didn't understand it the first time, you should have asked for an explanation then, rather than remaining in a state of ignorance;>
I did. That is what I was asking when I typed the ?
<Motion practice deadlines?>
<3) if you think PTSC is going to allow shareholdes to actually make decisions about future income that would be binding on the Company, we'll agree to disagree.>
Clever way to avoid an answer, but unfortunately sounds defeatist. I'm sure was not your intent.
Opty