IMO the whole release of the info was contrived. My take is the royalty rates were only there to establish a negotiation number on the final settlement which obviously is much lower but I still believe much higher than nuisance value. My question is where did they come up with the royalty rate percentage. Funny how all day long people as I did posted that this is a one time license fee and it what was somewhat ignored. It was crystal clear after getting the addendum and reading it.

Don't understand the logo request why have them spend money on that just pay us extra.

We finally had a chance to look at the language of the contract and specifically the downstream licensing langauge that is mentioned in the Quanta decision. I don't know if our language would pass that test but I also could see the Quanta issue back in court. Hopefully not TPL v Someone at least not while own it.

We are getting real close to this shifting in our direction for good(enough) to make profits as seen in the previous run. There is obviously still something they are worried about in the ruling that have precluded them from issuing the PR. How long is the question. Until then it will be the same stock action of the past.