I actually feel good about owning PTSC stock. I may also get spanked at a later date for saying this as well, but maybe our BoD may have actually been considering shareholders in their latest round of agreements/settlement with Leckrone.

If only Leckrone would grow a conscience, settle with Moore and do the right thing regarding MMP licensing, perhaps we can get to a place again where we will have a chance to make some money with this stock. He can troll for patents till the cows come home but our window is closing on the MMP.

I reserve the right to change my mind if the BoD fails to present shareholers with their plan to successfully market PTSC to the world. I'm hoping the annual shareholder meeting will be different this year ....more than the same old 400 infringers on notice, announced licenses, marketing plan and dividend announcement perhaps?

As much as I hate to say this, maybe they will make Leckrone the CEO, Chairman and President (like Pohl), give him performance based options and a reason to want to help PTSC to grow. No offense to Cliff, however, with Leckrone at the helm (on record), it might be better for all of us. Anyway, Cliff already said he has no intentions of owning this stock, so he shouldn't be CEO, interim or otherwise. I'm sure he is an excellent CFO.