The ITC is definitely the hare whereas the No District CA is the tortoise. Within 2 months of its August 2011 ITC filing for Core Flash, TPL began to license some of these companies. Perhaps we will be just as lucky

Last March, TPL posted the following in a PR

PR dated March 28,2012

TPL previously filed complaints with the ITC and in US District Court against 18 companies in August 2011. Eight of those companies have since purchased licenses. Five active respondents remain in the investigation. The remainder of the original respondents were either terminated based on findings of default or stipulated consent orders. Under the current schedule, trial commences in September 2012 and the target date for the completion of the investigation is February 2013.

http://www.alliacense.com/the-tpl-group-files-second-wave-of-itc-and-district-court-complaints-on-core-flash-technology-2/

The complaint was filed August 2011 case 337-TA-807. By March 28, information that I glanced at indicated that the following players were out on the basis of licenses or stipulated consent orders:

Coby

Aluratek

Aiptek

Curtis

Circus World

Royal Consumer

ViewSonic

Ceiva

Eastman Kodak

The following were found in default: Nextar, Win Accord ltd, Win Accord USA

Corrections welcome

Also, for anyone who cares to register with the ITC - there is no charge to review documents on line. There are even a couple of Core Flash license agreements with some information redacted. You may find it interesting to review the agreements. Maybe it will give some insight into MMP license agreements (or not). https://edis.usitc.gov/edis3-external/app case 337-TA-807