Re: ......and a question
in response to
by
posted on
Jun 19, 2012 12:30PM
Thanks and agree but it does seem that there is a "tail wagging the dog" element given that there are a reported 16000 souls impacted by the decisions of an unchecked party of three.
I suppose that if they hold to the suggestion that they will be paying dividends rather than trying to invest, this stock could become very attractive to much needed institutional investors.
To repeat a line used often here... We shall see.