I would say that most good "hired guns" (IP Attorneys) can advocate the idea of the ring oscillator being used as a variable speed system clock just as well as Moore. I would equate it to describing how a combustible engine works. Mechanics, skilled in the automotive repair world, could all explain how a combustible engine works. A beautician might not know. So most good IP attorneys are like mechanics trying to explain how a combustible engine works, they are skilled in the field.

I thought of that too, when I read your original assessment. I should have provided greater specifics, whereby, Moore could have provided "key insight or simple phrase or intent from the patent originator", that the Court may have an easier time understanding and/or believing than an IP lawyer....Virt