Re: New Pacer: Order Denying Motion for Summary Judgement 3-26-12
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 26, 2012 04:58PM
<timing...>
The court should have done this a long time ago. Are you suggesting it is being done now simply because it needed to get done before Markman results? Perhaps the court is ready to make Markman public, but saw this needed to be taken care of first.
Is that what you mean by "timing......."?
Opty