Even if the jury verdict is appealed and we need to wait for a couple more years for finality?

Absolutely 100%, yes! I would welcome an appeal if we won or lost. Why? Because we would most likely be 80% to 95% on our way to finality because the vast majority of cases that go to trial, only a small percentage of the verdicts are amended or reversed. So, yes, I would welcome a jury verdict with an appeal because we could all be 80 to 95% certain of the outcome.

Currently we are 50/50 and it is a blind 50/50. We have no information to base our investment decision.

Is TPL still plotting and scheming?

- We don't know the Leckrone settlement details

Does the MMP have the teeth?

- Not management's fault but communication is 0

Is the BOD only concerned about leading investors on for several more years to collect salaries?

- They don't have any shares of the company purchased from their salaries.

There are many other questions and who knows from an investor standpoint with all the uncertainty?

A jury verdict would put virtually all of the issues to rest. And then investors could play the odds of an appeal.

I would welcome dividends but I would be skeptical of staying invested without management communicating clearly as to what they expect from licensing. Will Leckrone try his games again? Will we unload our war chest by issuing dividends only to find we may have needed that money for some future legal issue with Leckrone?

So I would prefer a jury verdict, win or lose, in relation to all other scenarios because I would never have to think about what if?