It is my understanding and belief that between Nielson, Chet Brown, Chuck Moore and perhaps others, Leckrone has pretty much committed his 1/2 of the licensing fees to others.

It is my understanding and belief that there are no performance requirements pressing him to sign any license agreements (thanks again to those who were paid for their part in consummating the Master Agreement). If this is true, you have to ask yourself why would he want to push for license agreements when he makes more money from the expenses he continues to submit, and the $86K he will receive for 90 days past the Markman hearing. Correct me if I am wrong but isn't there still a quarterly payment to Alliacense via Phoenix Digital Solutions. Even if I'm wrong about the quarterly payments, doesn't it seem that Leckrone has assured himself a steady income from expenses without having to sign a single license.

Patriot wouldn't answer the question about why there was a substitution of legal counsel for the infringement litigation with Barco/Acer. Could it be that the new attorney is working on a contingency basis because the well is running dry?

Just my thoughts and opinions.