Unfortunately Ron feels compelled to use the Agora violation system to bad-mouth me. A strange, if not improper, use of Agora's violation system and beyond that, I do not like people taking about others behind their backs.

A Hub Leader deleted a post by BUSHleague and BUSHleague reposted it complaining about the HL's action deleting his initial post. I reported that post as a violation because it is my understanding that Agora does not want members making such complaints on the board and has requested numerous times that any complaints regarding Hub moderation be directed to Agora via email.

Ron processed my violation report as an ignore violation, which is fine with me. But Ron felt compelled to add the following in a message to BUSHleague.

<Actually, it was the HL himself who engaged in improper conduct in deleting your first post, and who has now accentuated his bias in "flagging" the re-post. One must wonder why he doesn't flag posts by some others, who I understand have been very insulting and coarse in some of their recent missives. This HL represented that he could be unbiased, but has been exactly the opposite since his appointment.>

Ron knows I reported the violation and assumed that I deleted BUSHleague's post. Reading Ron's apologetic message and the part I underlined, most would come to the conclusion that it was I who deleted BUSHleague's post. WRONG! I DID NOT DELETE THE POST IN QUESTION! I only reported BUSleague's subsequent complaint. Perhaps the HL who made the initial deletion will provide that information.

So with this, hopefully BUSHleague has a little better understanding of the facts regarding the deleted post.

I regret having to use the public forum to correct what I perceive as abusive behavior. I know Agora will not take any action against Ron since they never addressed any of my prior compalints involving him.

Yes Ron. There is bias at play on this board. On that I agree.

Opty