Actually, I don't ask out of interest in the answers, but out of interest in YOUR KNOWLEDGE of the answers. Because, in your criticisms and commentary, you don't demonstrate the knowledge, yet you state your opinion as fact as though you have absolute command of it.

You posted definitively (as opposed to opinion), though to me it clearly came off as assumption. I was asking you to clarify / justify that apparent contradiction, as for you to have posted as you did, would imply absolute knowledge of the answers to the questions I asked. I'm pretty sure, (my assumption based on your posting history), that you are not aware of the answers, but more than likely took someone's word for what happened.

Nonetheless, you raised points in your post about what could have / what would others have done, and my posts clearly answered those. I see you'd rather divert rather than address in kind. Your perrogative.

Lastly, I don't debate that PTSC notified some shareholders of their intentions. I do contest that PTSC notified ALL shareholders of their intentions. If you care to support your implication that they did, than please provide the link to the COMPANY'S notification of same and I'll gladly stand corrected. Please read and clearly understand what I wrote there, before you respond. Thanks in advance.