on what coulda/should/woulda happeend (as previously stated by Ron).
The real debate should be about what is the plan going forward?
Does PTSC have enough evidence to move forward in Superior Court to have the ComAg terminated as requested in the 1st amended complaint? If so, why after the recent PR about moving forward with litigation have they not pressed the attorneys to make a move in Superior Court immediately?
While TPL is stalling once again by asking the Supreme Court to review the arbitration clause (I believe), doesn't it seem prudent that PTSC should move quickly to have the Superior Court terminate the ComAg?
Anyone?