Let's try it another way.

Was there anything in my post, which is copied below, that you disagree with?

<I do not believe the suggestion to send the SEC a complaint about PTSC not following through with a pr is not to be taken seriously by anyone.

The communication gave an indication of time when the company will issue a pr based on the culmination of certain events.

If the events have not yet culminated, all you are doing is creating a nuisance and unnecessary work for the SEC. IMO the squeeky wheel thing does not apply in that case. Shooting yourself in the foot may be more applicable. IMO.>

Your interjection into the dialogue had me believing you found some fault with what I posted, or at least disagreed with it. If you are unable to clarify for me perhaps someone else can. Apparenly I am the only one not able to understand where you stand.

Opty