OK, I'm rethinking this. TPL was notified June 2nd that the Opening Brief was late. They had until the 17th to file the Opening Brief. 15 days from the clerk's notice.

My understanding of the sipulations is that they are automatic extensions of time. If not stipulated the appelle must request it from the court and explain why.

So, actually it does appear there may be a June 13th stipulated extension of time of 15 days which would be 15 days from the stipulation or June 28th.

I agree that the file seems to read that way. Still no idea how July 5 enters the equation.

My problem is the stipulated extention of time. We opposed the 3rd extension of time on May 25th. And the court refused to grant it. Why would be do a 180 and agree to another extension of time? Whose side is PTSC on?

I do know that at some point this goes back to the trial court and there will be an entry when that happens. It hasn't happened yet, and perhaps both sides do not want the entry made yet? It is the only logic I can see for the 180, if indeed that is what happened.

Quite possible my original interpetation was not totally correct. If so I apologize. As usual with PTSC the facts that are known, typically will make no sense.

Opty