Are there similarities ...you decide
And yet while Goldman's returns have been subpar, CEO Lloyd Blankfein is getting paid like he's crushing the market. As the
Financial Times reported this week, Blankfein "was paid $14m in 2010, more than 15 times his 2009 earnings, as senior bankers collectively shed their hair shirts." That' s just one year's compensation.
This highlights the real problem with Goldman Sachs. Like other investment banks, it isn't run for the benefit of its clients, or for the benefit of public shareholders, despite what its
business principles say (#3: "Our goal is to provide superior returns to our shareholders.") No, Goldman and other publicly traded Wall Street firms are really ingenious machines for spinning revenues into compensation for insiders. If that means other stakeholders do poorly while executives make out great, that's just the way it goes.
This is really nothing new. In 1940 Fred Schwed, Jr., published the classic book on how brokers prosper while investors suffer. It was entitled
Where Are the Customers' Yachts? Goldman Sachs stockholders might rightly ask
Where Are the Shareholders' Yachts? The returns provided to them under Lloyd Blankfein in the past five years aren't enough to buy a ride on the Staten Island ferry.