Friday, Jun 24 2011
| 10:31AM |
|
| |
5:08-cv-00877-JF - Acer, Inc. et al v. Technology Properties Limited et al
Case Mgmt Conference Further |
| |
5:08-cv-00882-JF - HTC Corporation et al v. Technology Properties Limited et al
Case Mgmt Conference Further |
| |
5:08-cv-05398-JF - Barco NV v. Patriot Scientific Corporation et al
Case Mgmt Conference Further |
http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/CEO/cfd.aspx?7136
Here we go again, we almost had a Markman now all we have is ......more waiting, no updates from our CEO....tick tock.
Do you think that another re-examination request will be submitted to the USPTO citing prior art for the new patent claims which we assert the new HTC/Acer products infringe upon? Can this company survive another re-exam coupled with the on-going litigation expenses and other company expenses? Will Judge Fogel allow another stay while the Plaintiffs possibly request a new re-exam?
