First off, it doesn't appear that your prior post has been removed (but perhaps another HL removed it, then a HL "unremoved" it). Regardless, what YOU say is essentially the same as what ggalala posted yesterday.

I direct your attention to my reply to ggalala's post, posted on Mar 21, 11 08:27PM.

You make an accusation against unidentified fellow posters based on a premise that simply does not exist.

Who are these people? Who are the "cheerleaders", and exactly what are they cheering about?

Or perhaps you can provide a thoughtful reply to my post?

I cannot speak for other HLs, but I'll let your post stand even though it appears you are firing blanks into a crowd for no reason other than to encourage infighting. This way EVERYONE will know your focus of attention, your blatantly obvious true objective.

BTW, your post would be considered by most to be OT. The OT police might get you (and this post).

Now I challenge you: identify one solitary post within the last week that remotely suggests a desire by anyone to maintain the "company status quo". My opinions about REALITY don't count, as it is NOT a defense of the status quo, but merely an uncontested observation that the status quo is not realistically subject to change through some abstract action by shareholders. At least not for about three years.

I await your findings. You suggest they are prevailent, so based on that it should be an easy task. Others, offering thumbs, are welcomed to assist. IMO, this is another topic of redundant pointless discussion that needs to be put to bed.

I do find it interesting that while this board was (obviously IMO) manipulated previously, you were silent. Now, when there is (IMO) ZERO evidence of manipulation, you raise the concern. Hasn't everyone been permitted their say, to the extreme?

And note that, in the past, if someone of low ranking questioned the actions of a HL, they were banned on the spot. Your post stands (unless another HL acted while I composed this reply).

SGE