< One writer (that I quoted to you in a previous post) said in effect, that if it was required as a condition of re-certification, in his opinion it would be considered substantial. He also cited a case to back that up.>

As I recall, we were required to change external to off-chip, or add off-chip. Not sure which and not going to look. But would an on-chip second clock make any sense? Does the amendment change anything? Since it was required, your writer would consider that a substantial change?

Opty