"Yes, I do. How come we never talk about that?"

Taking a quick gander back at your posting history, the VAST majority of your posts, essentially consist of you mocking other posters, or complaining about the subjects of their posts. A cursory look revealed only found one or two posts that included anything PTSC related.

If you want to talk about PTSC related items, why don't you?! Based on your posting history, your comment seems pretty disingenuous.

I tried to engage you on that very topic a week or so ago, regarding your educated opinion as to what you thought this past quarter would have resulted in for PDS considering the $7M in cash midway through January, versus the likely intensified litigation costs as suggested by the flurry of PACER documents, but like tumbleweeds through a deserted western town, you remained silent.

I requested a while back for ANYONE to comment how the following quote from PTSC's recent PR represents a move FORWARD for the PTSC BOD's abiltiy to avoid being "out-negotiated" again, as they seem to have been on most, if not all, past negotiated agreements. Again, silence from you and most others.

"The resolution included an agreement to provide a substantial increase in working capital for the MMP licensing program and patent infringement litigation from MMP licensing proceeds."

Do you think the problem in the past with licensing efforts and amount of licensing dollars secured was a function of limited working capital for PDS? Do you think that the recent funding increase substantially improves that prospect over the wording of the previous funding language? While PTSC also references that TPL has agreed to additional PTSC oversight with respect to MMP licensing, considering their inability to navigate the previous oversight language to our benefit as shareholders, are you confident that the new funding language won't simply translate to additional avenues and possiblitities for TPL to siphon MMP licensing funds off the top under the guise of "expenses", thus leaving LESS money for PTSC and TPL to split 50/50 after expenses?

Nobody has prevented you from discussing PTSC except yourself. Furthermore, there has been plenty of PTSC discussion here that from which you have chosen to remain on the sidelines.

Why DON'T you talk about these things that you ask why people don't talk about them?!