<You want to believe that a CMC is, in effect, a settlement conference>

No, that is not what I believe. What I was challenging with my post was your narrow view that the CMC can only be for trial setting. The logic of which you explained, and I appreciate that part of your post.

<None of the above is meant to say that federal judges don't do what they can to promote settlement.>

You seem to agree that settlement is a purpose, just never the primary purpose of a CMC. I suspect there might be two valid points of view here. The purpose of requesting this CMC is likely for trial setting pruposes as you say. However, I hope the judge's primary focus at any CMC is always trying to resolve issues, move the two sides closer together and avoiding trial if he can. If you agree with that statement then we are on the same page.

Opty