Re: E. “Ring Oscillator” and Related Terms (JCCS Row 22) TPL's response
posted on
Feb 23, 2011 11:19AM
<Plaintiffs have not only tacked on improper limitations to the ring oscillator, as described above, but they also do not acknowledge that the patents exclude only those clocks that directly rely on an external clock or command input control signal to generate a clock signal. >
I do believe the underlined might be describing the scope of the invention, by exclusion.
Opty