<Well, if Fogel accepts Ward's definition, then he won't need to further define the construction of "variable speed clock". At that point, it will all be determined by whether the evidence supporting Barco's motion can be materially disputed with other competent evidence.>

Agree with the above.

The following might need some clarification. You seem to be stating the obvious, but to what end?

<It really doesn't matter what any of us thinks about it, since only what the judge thinks is important. >

I hope you are not saying that discussion of any such topic, which is not within our means to determine, is not worth discussing. How esle does one form and refine opinions?

Opty