Why do you say the nomination (of Pete) was ineligible from the onset? Did the SEC state that the nomination was ineligible? Or, did the BoD use the "not qualified in their opinion" reason for excluding him? If that is the case then surely it was a waste of shareholder money when it could be argued that an anesthesiologist was no more qualified than Pete.

Also, Miles do you know if Schrock and Mistry were asked to resign from the BoD or did they resign on their own. Would be interesting to know if it is the later, what reasons they gave. :)

Corrections welcome