That seems to be a more plausible alternative source of the funds, but if that were the case, it seems that for PTSC not to highlight that source after filing the NT-10Q citiing potential settlement issues, seems incomplete. Additionally, they indicated this would be a material subsequent event, and no such disclosure was made. I still think it's likley to be simply license fees received since the close of the quarter. As for the Jan 13 date, I don't think there's any special significance to that date other than that's when they closed the data for the report/filing, ie. the day before they actually issued the 10q.