It is not me that is saying Moore's litigation is not about MMP ownership.

IT IS MOORE

Nothing needs to be explained to me as made perfectly clear from a prior post.

<There is absolutely no disagreement as to what the complaint is about. It certainly wasn't my intent to try and convince anyone here that the litigation wasn't about owership of the MMP. Only that it wasn't in the public eye as such.>

Selective reading, no doubt.

Opty