Vote or no vote will change nothing.

If every investor withheld their votes for every board member, all it would take is each board member to vote for themselves to be re-elected.

It will, however, tell us something when we see the number of withheld votes compared to the votes FOR each board member in the quarterly statement following the meeting.

If Pete Lozano had been allowed to run for the board, then we would have had four people now running for three seats. Then and only then could we have voted out Johnson, Felcyn or Flowers. That is exactly why the board fights so hard, with our money, to NEVER have a contested election. My guess is that if they had allowed Pete to run, they would simply have passed another bylaw amendment limiting the number of board seats to four to ensure they would never lose their seats.

With PTSC more than likely changing its accelerated filer status at the end of the fiscal year, shareholders will have to wait three years before they can nominate anyone for a board seat.

Corrections welcome.