<Hard to believe in Moore's challenge if this is the accepted status in court filings.>

Are you suggesting that because there is an accepted status, it must be correct and lawful?

< PTSC seems to take no exception to this either.>

The issue is not theirs to decide or even influence. Hence, what would you have them say?

<Can TPL claim ownership in filings if they are just a liscensing agent? >

USA is a free country. TPL is free to claim anything they want.

The first two causes of action in Moore's complaint are 1. Cancellation of the Instrument (ComAg) due to fraud. and 2. Cancellation of instrument (ComAg) due to mistake/misrepresentation. I think the fact that Moore did not have independant legal representation in such an important undertaking is probably problematic. And if Leckrone never stopped being his attorney, I would think that would be problematic. For those reasons alone I think there is merit to Moore's case.

All IMHO

Opty