Sir

My point was that if the BoD were as is alleged, ad nauseum, then an external agency would already be examining their conduct:

As I said in my previous post, had there been even an inkling of impropriety by the BoD the "great" legal minds would already be all over it, if not by direct action, then ongoing and regular complaints to the SEC. After all these years of allegations, why has there been absolutely no evidence of any type of formal investigation?

What or whom are you suggesting be investigated?:

An investigation is warranted, imo, and I am certain you agree. The person conducting this investigation must be qualified; no such person exists in our board of directors or is employed by our company

Further to the SEC no-action letter that you kindly provided, have you conducted any further research into the 3% rule, as it pertains to PTSC?

.

.

.

Be well