Re: Request to Exclude Nomination Pursuant to Rule 14a-8(i)(8)
posted on
Sep 27, 2010 09:57AM
Interesting arguments by PTSC's counsel
Please explain what was interesting about the arguments when the information used was already available for you to consider:
http://agoracom.com/ir/patriot/forums/discussion/topics/436716-response-to-ptsc-request-for-exclusion-of-stockholder-proposal/messages/1427878#message
http://agoracom.com/ir/patriot/forums/discussion/topics/436734-milestone/messages/1427952#message
http://agoracom.com/ir/patriot/forums/discussion/topics/437098-institutional-investors-approve-of-sec%E2%80%99s-shareholder-proxy-changes/messages/1428970#message
It was a basic response, to your comments to the SEC, in support of a No-Action Letter, using the available facts.
Interestingly, there was no need to raise the market cap issue to support their actions.
.
.
.
Be well