I told my husband not more than 90 minutes ago, that it shoud be time for Milestone to come out and join in the fun. Thank you for not disappointing me :).

Just as I have taken the liberty to post information relating to shareholder actions that have gone well for shareholders, I respect your right to share your knowledge about shareholder actions that have not gone well for the shareholders.

I still believe that legal advice is a good thing and as previously stated, I am willing to contribute $1000 to have an expert determine if:

1) There is a way to change corporate governance for the benefit of all

2) There have been breaches of fiduciary duties, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment and gross mismanagement

3) Certain investors were in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act") pursuant to § 16(b) of the act, for disgorgement of short-swing profits allegedly obtained by acting as a group in violation of that section of the Act

I am most concerned right now with number one above. If, however, our expert legal counsel discovers there are grounds for a suit based on number 2 and/or 3, wouldn't you be interested in pursuing this line of action for the benefit of the "mom and pop" shareholders? This is assuming of course that you are one of those shareholders.

I also have noted your unwillingnes to answer some direct questions I asked you on more than one occasion. If you are not on the PTSC BoD, nor are you related via blood or by business relationships to the BoD or any of the investors such as Swartz, CC Investments, Lincoln etc., then surely you wouldn't mind saying it for the record.

Thank you,

Laurie