You wrote: how does this kind of thing increase shareholder value? I would think it would have the opposite of the intended effect

What exactly is the opposite effect when we are sitting at .109? Do you mean the shareprice would drop to zero? From where I'm sitting, that wouldn't make much of a difference at this point in time.

I am for change. Change that would bring about term limits, majority voting without loopholes, and compensation limits. Yes, I would also like to know if there have been breaches of fiduciary duties, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment and gross mismanagement. The attorney may also want to take a closer look at some of the investors to determine if they acted as a group and/or influenced board decisions for the purpose of self enrichment.

I am not an attorney so I am not qualified to comment on what action should be taken by shareholders. It will be up to a qualified attorney to counsel those of us who are interested in following the best course of action, which could ultimately be NO action.

Right now the only action I would like to see is for interested parties to step up to the plate once and for all, as I have done, and make a financial commitment for the purpose of seeking qualified advice. If you are not interested in contributing, I respect your decision, please respect my desire to know what our legal options might be.

I hope this answers your concerns.

Laurie