My take on your choices.

Nos 1 and 2 were rejected, so I don't think it matters much to others that those were your top choices. Perhaps I'm missing something.

No 3, 4 and 5 are not candidates.

Is this the opening pitch to draft nos 3, 4, and 5? I'm at a loss as to why any of them need prodding. Actually surprised that Ron and Brian have not already done as you are suggesting. But they may have their reasons. You seem to know Lamberts beyond what he posts here. Unfortunately I do not know him, or Ron or Brian beyond their posts here.

However, looking forward to learning more about Nos 3, 4, and 5 should they take you up on your implied suggestion.

Opty