You said

"I can't help but smile at the perceived inequity of someone who may own 8 million shares paying for an initial opinion from an SEC lawyer with their money."

What if someone with 8 million shares has paid for such an opinion. Why should they be obligated to inform you, me or anyone else of such an opinion when we have not shared one cent in the cost of obtaining such an opinion.

What if that person bought their 8 million shares for $.10 per share and someone else bought their 650,000 shares at $1.25 per share......now where is the inequity?

Are you ready, willing and able to put up some money to obtain a legal opinion (SEC attorney or ???) on our by-laws and the legal means that shareholders have available to them to induce change?

Furthermore, under the current by-laws, please tell me how the shareholders would go about unseating Faulk, Felcyn or Johnson if the majority wanted it so?