What if someone with 8 million shares has paid for such an opinion. Why should they be obligated to inform you, me or anyone else of such an opinion when we have not shared one cent in the cost of obtaining such an opinion.

No obligation at all, but sharing an opinion which could give the basis for further action must be a no-brainer. Obviously, if the opinion was such that there was little to no chance of successfully prosecuting the allegations, who in their right mind would publish it?

Furthermore, under the current by-laws, please tell me how the shareholders would go about unseating Faulk, Felcyn or Johnson if the majority wanted it so?

I have already done this, with approximate costings, for a proxy solicitation.

As I believe PTSC is fully SEC compliant, there is no way that I would throw away a single cent of my money trying to prove otherwise. Let those who complain/allege the loudest throw the first dollar.

.

.

.

Be well