By no means trying to defend our undefendable bod but, when they mention in the pacer that TPL is negotiating a business deal, and since TPL represents us in all court related activity could they simply just mention TPL only because they are our representative? I also feel that our Bod needs to be more proactive in defending and defining our interest. It just seems that they take advantage of the situation that TPL is in control of all litigation and use that as an excuse not to keep us informed which inturn creates more animosity form the shareholders. They need to get a clue and realize the importance of the impiety this behavior projects.