Are you talking about the "BoD apologist" that has now opined THREE TIMES that the BoD made a blunder in making an unsecured loan to TPL? How 'bout I go a step further - the BoD decision to make an unsecured loan to TPL was moronic at best. Am I still a "BoD apologist"? If I am, then I suggest you are as well.
Now, do you have a sensible counter-argument to anything I've posted this morning? Anything? It appears not, only name-calling, exageration and complete mis-representation - as usual. And everybody sees it, clear as day.
SGE