I believe that many here welcome a dialogue on all matters PTSC, the problem arises when it becomes a diatribe against the BoD which negates any meaningful dialogue.

Rather than the constant berating of the BoD, where is the dialogue as to possible solutions, both pro and con?

As to "accurate criticism", I would dearly like to see, "squandered", "self-interests", and "incompetent" included in any proxy solicitation to replace the current BoD, facing the inevitable legal challenge.

No matter what one may believe, proving any of the above is going to be much more difficult than saying there has been over $125M in revenues, look at the current share price now.

.

.

.

Be well